UK AI Visibility Index · Category
How 5 leading UK health & wellness brands compare on the way generative AI systems perceive them.
Leader
Bupa
75
Average
5 brands
61
Range
low / high
48–75
Pillar columns show category-relative performance — +N is points above the category average, −N is points below.
| Rank | Brand | Band | AI Visibility | Δ | Strongest pillar | Weakest pillar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 |
Bupa
|
Challenger | 75 | ▲ +10 | Entity Resolution +39 | Foundational 0 |
| 02 |
PureGym
|
Challenger | 62 | ▲ +4 | Authority & Citation +18 | Entity Resolution −7 |
| 03 |
Holland & Barrett
|
Leader | 61 | ▲ +12 | Entity Resolution +7 | Foundational −11 |
| 04 |
Specsavers
|
Leader | 60 | ▼ -6 | Authority & Citation +18 | Entity Resolution −17 |
| 05 |
MedExpress
|
Emerging | 48 | ▲ +3 | Technical & RAG +5 | Authority & Citation −52 |
Brands ranked 6-50 by Tranco within Health & Wellness that were considered for the Index.
We publish the candidates list as a transparency surface — the next 5-10 brands per category that were considered but did not make the Index, with their Tranco rank.
This is not an extended ranking — these brands have not been audited. The list documents editorial integrity: anyone can see who else was in scope and verify the selection against the methodology.
Each brand is audited by GenSight's 35-signal deterministic scoring engine. Selection is by Tranco rank within category, with cultural-perception classification verifying each brand reads as British — see how brands are selected.
Health & Wellness composition holds until the annual reshuffle (next: Jan 2027). Audit scores refresh quarterly. Detail pages update at the same URL.
Run the same methodology against your own brand. Free summary, no signup required.
Run a free audit →